![Dominican School of Philosophy & Theology (DSPT)](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- Видео 266
- Просмотров 319 765
Dominican School of Philosophy & Theology (DSPT)
США
Добавлен 3 мар 2014
DSPT is the Center of Studies of the Western Dominican Province of the USA. The school grants graduate degrees in Philosophy and Theology and is the only Catholic graduate institution in the U.S. to offer students the opportunity to integrate philosophy and theology in a concurrent MA Philosophy and Theology program.
2024 Commencement Speech | Dr. Margaret M. Turek, S.Th.D.
2024 Commencement Speech | Dr. Margaret M. Turek, S.Th.D.
Просмотров: 237
Видео
2024 Commencement Student Speech | Br. Nikolas Barth, OFM, Cap
Просмотров 1892 месяца назад
2024 Commencement Student Speech | Br. Nikolas Barth, OFM, Cap
Sean Bryan | An Alumnus Perspective on Gaudium et Spes: 60 Years Later
Просмотров 825 месяцев назад
Sean Bryan, DSPT alumnus, Operations Director at the Lay Mission Project, and American Ninja Warrior (aka Papal Ninja), offers an alumnus perspective on the history and application of Gaudium et Spes at the 2024 DSPT Convocation of the College of Fellows on "The Church in the Modern World...And in These Times." This portion of the Convocation was moderated by DSPT student, Andrew DiCrisi. The P...
Matthew Brown | A Student Perspective on Gaudium et Spes: 60 Years Later
Просмотров 1275 месяцев назад
DSPT student Matthew Brown offers a student perspective on the history and application of Gaudium et Spes at the 2024 DSPT Convocation of the College of Fellows on "The Church in the Modern World...And in These Times." This portion of the Convocation was moderated by DSPT student, Andrew DiCrisi. The Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes (1965) was a somewhat novel kind of constitution, devoted...
Paola Pruett-Vergara | A Student Perspective on Gaudium et Spes: 60 Years Later
Просмотров 615 месяцев назад
DSPT student Paola Pruett-Vergara offers a student perspective on the history and application of Gaudium et Spes at the 2024 DSPT Convocation of the College of Fellows on "The Church in the Modern World...And in These Times." This portion of the Convocation was moderated by DSPT student, Andrew DiCrisi. The Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes (1965) was a somewhat novel kind of constitution, ...
Br. Philip Neri Gerlomes, OP | A Student Perspective on Gaudium et Spes: 60 Years Later
Просмотров 1645 месяцев назад
DSPT student Br. Philip Neri Gerlomes, OP offers a student perspective on the history and application of Gaudium et Spes at the 2024 DSPT Convocation of the College of Fellows on "The Church in the Modern World...And in These Times." This portion of the Convocation was moderated by DSPT student, Andrew DiCrisi. The Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes (1965) was a somewhat novel kind of consti...
Fr. Michael Sweeney Responds to JD Flynn | Gaudium et Spes: 60 Years Later
Просмотров 905 месяцев назад
(Audio improves at 1:00) Fr. Michael Sweeney, OP responds to the key note address by JD Flynn on "The Church in the Modern World...And in These Times" at the Convocation of Fellows. The topic engages the history and application of the Vatican II Pastoral Document, Gaudium et Spes. The Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes (1965) was a somewhat novel kind of constitution, devoted not to doctrine...
Russ Hittinger Responds to JD Flynn | Gaudium et Spes: 60 Years Later
Просмотров 855 месяцев назад
Dr. Russ Hittinger, philosopher, responds to the key note address by JD Flynn on "The Church in the Modern World...And in These Times" at the Convocation of Fellows. The topic engages the history and application of the Vatican II Pastoral Document, Gaudium et Spes. The Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes (1965) was a somewhat novel kind of constitution, devoted not to doctrine strictly unders...
Gaudium et Spes: 60 Years Later | JD Flynn
Просмотров 2735 месяцев назад
JD Flynn, founder and editor at The Pillar, presents the key note at the 2024 DSPT Convocation of the College of Fellows on "The Church in the Modern World...And in These Times." The conversation focused on the history and application of the Vatican II Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes. The Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes (1965) was a somewhat novel kind of constitution, devoted not t...
Annual Aquinas Lecture 2023 | Dr. Matthew Levering
Просмотров 833Год назад
In this lecture, "Christ's Cross at the Center of the Mystical Body: Scripture, St. Thomas Aquinas, and Recent Theology", Prof. Levering argues that the theology of the Church should flow from the theology of the Cross, since to be a Christian is to share in the saving power of Christ’s Cross and to be configured to it. When Christians fail to apprehend the centrality of the Cross, their unders...
2020-2022 DSPT Graduation Commencement Address | Fr. Michael Sweeney, O.P.
Просмотров 2742 года назад
2020-2022 DSPT Graduation Commencement Address | Fr. Michael Sweeney, O.P.
2020-2022 DSPT Graduation Commencement Student Address | Jarett Bilash
Просмотров 2592 года назад
2020-2022 DSPT Graduation Commencement Student Address | Jarett Bilash
The Annual DSPT Commencement Exercises
Просмотров 2433 года назад
The Annual DSPT Commencement Exercises
Copy of Loss of Trust and Crisis of Leadership: Responses with the help of St Thomas Aquinas
Просмотров 1433 года назад
Copy of Loss of Trust and Crisis of Leadership: Responses with the help of St Thomas Aquinas
DSPT Faculty on Integrating Philosophy and Theology
Просмотров 3803 года назад
DSPT Faculty on Integrating Philosophy and Theology
Hope as an Emotion Versus Hope as a Virtue
Просмотров 4623 года назад
Hope as an Emotion Versus Hope as a Virtue
Wise Habits presents: Purgatory - A Gift from God
Просмотров 2823 года назад
Wise Habits presents: Purgatory - A Gift from God
The Dumb Ox Speaks: Aquinas on Disagreement
Просмотров 3753 года назад
The Dumb Ox Speaks: Aquinas on Disagreement
Wise Habits presents: Walking the Camino de Santiago as a Marian Devotion, Fr. Bart Hutcherson, OP
Просмотров 3823 года назад
Wise Habits presents: Walking the Camino de Santiago as a Marian Devotion, Fr. Bart Hutcherson, OP
Fr Peter COVID 19 Announcement, October 2020
Просмотров 2843 года назад
Fr Peter COVID 19 Announcement, October 2020
The Dumb Ox Speaks: David Hume and Miracles
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.3 года назад
The Dumb Ox Speaks: David Hume and Miracles
Tuesday Mass Reflection by Fr. Peter Rogers, OP May 12, 2020
Просмотров 1854 года назад
Tuesday Mass Reflection by Fr. Peter Rogers, OP May 12, 2020
Tuesday Mass Reflection by Fr. Peter Rogers, OP, May 5, 2020
Просмотров 1124 года назад
Tuesday Mass Reflection by Fr. Peter Rogers, OP, May 5, 2020
The Dumb Ox Speaks: Religion and Peace
Просмотров 3124 года назад
The Dumb Ox Speaks: Religion and Peace
Tuesday Mass Reflection by Fr. Peter Rogers, OP, April 28, 2020
Просмотров 1004 года назад
Tuesday Mass Reflection by Fr. Peter Rogers, OP, April 28, 2020
The Dumb Ox Speaks: Aquinas's Arguments for God's Existence
Просмотров 6734 года назад
The Dumb Ox Speaks: Aquinas's Arguments for God's Existence
You know who's really wonderful? You
Thank you for this explanation.
Could someone kindly tell me whether I have correctly understood the key differience with how Aquinas understands the resistabillity of grace, contra Augustine? Augustine sees all grace as intrinsically efficacious (or irresistible), since the creaturely will has nothingness as its only independent source. Therefore the only thing that distingishes sufficient grace from efficient grace is the strength of the impulse from God. Aquinas, however, makes a real distinction between the nature of sufficient grace versus intrinsically effectual grace, since, following Aristotle, the creaturely will is actually informed by being, as opposed to the platonic notion that the creature is devoid of the actual substance of being. This means that sufficient grace must be cooperated with by the will (which has actually been informed by grace) in order for it to go from potency to act, thus grounding the responsibillity of the will to act. Augustine, on the other hand, places all the responsibility to act with the will of God alone. Have I understood this correctly?
14:57 Seeing massive rate of divorce and annulments among Catholics, particular in USA, this saying about "marriage as friendship" fell deaf to my ears.
10:30 "Christocentric humanism" is a steel bar made from wood. Christ is God and man, you cannot be humanist putting God, ultimately, at the center.
9:53 Solidarity with unborn anyone?
9:19 Proper interpretation of Gaudium et Spes is so hard to achieve, that I think: why bother? Isn't christian life easier and more fruitful without spending time on document that is easy to misinterpreted and hard to interpreted properly?
Thank you Fathers. Grateful for this talk and q&a s.
My mom met him when he visited the Art Institute of Chicago when she studied there from 1948-52. She was in the back of a packed room by the door as Dali was mobbed by everyone. Apparently he wanted a quick exit and dropped to the floor, crawling between his admirers legs to the door. He stood up right in front of her and signaled she stay quiet, and ran out the door without saying a word. My mother was equally talented, and devoted her life to her family and students.
Thank you very much for this detailed video!
Probably the best speech that has ever been posted to this website
Thank you for such a thoughtful presentation, communicated with a real depth of feeling. May we grow in the poverty modelled by Francis, and above all, Christ.
Congratulations Br Nick. Great speech
Ecclesiastes chapter 7 v 16 says it all
Jesus parables are simple and tailor made for simple people like fisherman and shepherds.
A human being is a person. It’s not complicated.
I'd like to see a catholic spiritual posting
Very many thanks. I came across the Dali painting as a 10 yr old Catholic kid, and was startled and drawn into it. Likewise with Dali's other Christ figure, 'Corpus Hypercubus' ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion_(Corpus_Hypercubus) ). I was unaware of John of the Cross' sketch, which in some ways I find far more 'living' (ironic, but there it is) than Dali's - tho each has its own resonance.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
This Is Why in The Philippines They Have The Salubong Every Easter Sunday Commemorates This Scene
Father God Loves You so Much ❤️ Please let me know if You want to talk about Kingdom of God💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐
From marker 8:30ff: Brother's linking of Participatio Actuosa in Gaudium & Spes ¶68 and Sacrosanctum Concilium ¶14 made me sit up and gasp. There is so much to meditate on there! It seems telling that in the official English on the Vatican website, they are not translated the same.
Too many people have died in the name of Christ for anyone to hear the call.
The Beatific Vision is seeing Jesus in His glory, and also seeing the Person no one ever saw directly - the Father. There will always be limits to our perception of God even on the level of this Vision. But that's the real beauty of it - we'll keep chasing the limits eternally without ever reaching it. Thereby, the more we gaze upon God, the more wonderful and beautiful He will appear - as though, to us, He "grows" in beauty everyday, continually and eternally. That's what makes the Beatific Vision inexhaustible in our awe of the LORD God.
No, probably not. It’s a pretty clear teaching that individuals’ perception and splendor is correlated with their merits and position in heaven. The idea of God perceivably “growing” in beauty as the source of our “inexhaustible awe” is entirely unnecessary and honestly approximates blasphemy. Not for suggesting God would appear to change, because you seem to make it clear that He isn’t actually changing, but because it suggests that beholding God in and of Himself, even at our limited capacity, isn’t sufficient for perpetual admiration. God fully comprehends **everything**, including Himself, and is perfectly content within Himself. To be sustained at, by, and with the most infinitesimal drop of His perfection would be enough to produce permanent awe and joy.
@@John-ng8fx _"....because it suggests that beholding God in and of Himself, even at our limited capacity, isn’t sufficient for perpetual admiration."_ --> Thanks, I understand my error. Any extent of our gaze upon His glory, no matter how small, must and will produce inexhaustible, everlasting admiration. _"The idea of God perceivably “growing” in beauty as the source of our “inexhaustible awe” is entirely unnecessary and honestly approximates blasphemy."_ --> I agree. _"To be sustained at, by, and with the most infinitesimal drop of His perfection would be enough to produce permanent awe and joy."_ --> Very well said. This is a new perspective for me. Then, based on our exchange, I'd say that our enjoyment of God is (for lack of a better word) 'multi-layered'. Our least perception of His glory, even without any degree of growth, is enough to dazzle us for eternity; but that perception will also expand everyday without an end.
Read Luke. Now I will listen.
Finally. But majority will not believe it, despite it's historycal
I've never heard such blatant lies, there are numerous years recorded in the bible after Jesus death, and none of his followers celebrated his birthday.
The observance of Christmas on December 25 was not introduced until 353 A.D. The chief pastor at Rome, Julius I (336-352), had the imperial archives of Rome searched for the exact date of the birth of Christ. A subsequent pastor of Rome, Liberius (352-366), then fixed the celebration of Christmas for December 25. Justin Martyr (died 150 A.D.) writes: “Christ was born in Bethlehem, as may be gathered from the census records.” Another writer, Tertullian (155 or 160-220 or 230 A.D.), testifies that in the census of Augustus the Roman archives have provided the most reliable testimony of the birth of the Savior.
Love my catholic church is so full of teachings and it has an answer to every question , there is no way way that billions of cristians can be wrong by celebrating on december 25th . VIVA CRISTO REY .
So the pagans took the date from the true believers, hmmm and you want us to believe that?!!!!
Who he/she/it, celebrate Christmas is not a real follower of Jesus Christ nor a true Christian.
That's just it. There is a good "biblical" argument for why the 25th. I will accept that it can be debated that the Christians piggy-backed Saturnalia and Sol Invictus but the Winter Solstice has been recognized since the Neolithic period over 12,000 years ago. The reality is that the modern Jesus was born at the First Council of Nicaea, between May-Aug of 325 AD under Emporer Constantine. That's why December 25th was not recognized as the birth of Jesus Christ until 333 AD.
The Magi gave Gifts to Jesus - Not each other.??? Do you Worship Satan Claus, or Jesus Christ.???
❣️❣️
We are enjoying figuring out a jigsaw of this painting and your analysis of it has made our happy task even more enjoyable. Thank you.
They didn’t keep records of births then, the 25 th of December is the ROMAN festival of the SATURNALIA ,the Christian’s just picked that date to convert pagans
celebration of Christmas started before the emergence of Christendom, one of the theory is that Constantine put christmas on 25th to standardize all religious celebration together. christmas and saturnalia celebration were celebrate side by side at that time. Sol invictus was another celebration that came later to be incorporated into 25th dec.
I’ve had this vision , I seen a Holy light in clouds and felt the presence of God , the authority the the Father is so powerful , extremely powerful , it’s so beautiful plus you will KNOW it’s God , your spirit knows the Father , I’m so blessed to have experience the Spirit of God 💕💕💕
Thank you father for the information
Thankyou sir for nice explanation may Lord Jesus Christ Ji bless you.
Heidegger 1, fat metaphysician 0
D kung ginawa Ng kasakiman kapalit buong Buhay Ng bansa wow tanung sa bioscience ako hirap hulahak YOU/ONE ME/KAYONG GAHA!AN YOU SA STOCK KEYBANK INYO PATI NG TAU INYO.
Anu kayo sa Buhay nyo kayo hack syakin nyo lhat maligtas nyo dhil pag ako gumawa d nagtugma pag double Ng lhi.
Had the good fortune to be a parishioner at St. Dominic’s in Benicia when Augustine was there. Obviously an intellectual, but skilled and caring pastorally as well.
This is a great explanation. Thank you. It seems that matter is potentiality (quantum physics supports this). The potentiality is actualized by a mind. But we cannot actualize ourselves. So therefore, God.
Jesus was born unto Mary while her and Joseph were going to report for the Jewish census / Roman tax collection. The Bible is very specific about this. Jesus' birth time would be roughly near the end of March
Stuck in the middle of a church structure that has many issues including misogyny, patriarchy, homophobia, transphobia, racism, colonialism, etc... I have always appreciated Fr. Michael's ability to inspire the imagination and connect the student with the Great God of Love ever immanent and present in each moment of self-giving love.
5:44 bookmark
Dumb Ox - Are you correlative with God?
Modern philosophers have presented counterarguments to many of Hume's objections. Eg: "In his book Miracles C. S. Lewis notes that Hume can know that all experience favors his argument only by knowing in advance that all evidence in favor of miracle claims is false. But since he refuses to investigate miracles, he can know that these claims are false only by assuming that they do not happen. This is clearly circular reasoning, for Hume's position is certainly not evident a priori." (Skepticism: David Hume Gary R. Habermas ) "Hume‟s arguments against miracle are inconsistent with scientific and empirical principle he set out to defend. Generally, the doctrine of miracle is unacceptable to science because it (science) is rooted in the principle of regularities of nature. A critical look at the Big Bang theory which is accepted as a creditable scientific explanation of the origin of the universe explains that development of life is a onetime event and never repeated. If this is the case, why should possibility of miracle be denied on regularities condition? One can argue in this respect, that miracles are scientific events. " (AN ASSESSMENT OF DAVID HUME’S IMPOSSIBILITY OF MIRACLE Olubanjo-Olufowobi, Olufunso) "Hume's fourth criterion states that the miracle claims of many different religions cancel out rival ideologies. But such a criterion would be valid only if all miracle claims were true. That one religion may back its revelation claims with invalid "miracles" is no reason to reject a religion possessing valid claims. Inept systems cannot cancel a religion that may be supported by evidence that is shown to be probable. " (Skepticism: David Hume Gary R. Habermas )